City of Fernie

Community Wildfire Protection Plan

 

 

Considerations for Wildland Urban Interface Management in the City of Fernie, British Columbia

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Submitted by

 

B.A. Blackwell and Associates Ltd.

3087 Hoskins Road

North Vancouver, B.C.

V7J 3B5

 

 

 

 

Submitted to

 

Don Stewart and Brian Schmitz

City of Fernie, City Hall

501 3rd Avenue, Box 190

Fernie, BC V0B 1M0

 

December 2005


Table of Contents

 

1.0        Executive Summary. 7

2.0        Synopsis of Key Findings. 8

2.1     Risk Assessment 8

2.2     Communication and Education. 8

2.3     Structure Protection. 8

2.4     Access Management 9

2.5     Emergency Response. 9

2.6     Training. 9

2.7     Post Fire Rehabilitation. 9

3.0        Recommendations. 10

3.1     Communication and Education. 10

3.2     Structure Protection. 10

3.3     Access Management 11

3.4     Emergency Response. 11

3.5     Training. 11

3.6     Fuel Management 11

3.7     Post Fire Rehabilitation. 12

4.0        Introduction. 13

4.1     Background. 13

4.2     Purpose and Scope. 13

5.0        The City of Fernie. 14

5.1     Study Area. 14

5.2     Population. 15

5.3     Infrastructure. 15

5.4     Economy. 15

6.0        Fire Environment 16

6.1     Fire Weather 16

6.2     Fuels. 17

6.3     Mountain Pine Beetle and the Impact on Forest Fuels. 22

6.4     Topography. 28

6.5     Historic Ignitions. 29

7.0        Wildland Urban Interface Defined. 31

7.1     Vulnerability of the Wildland Urban Interface to Fire. 33

8.0        Wildland Urban Interface Continuum.. 34

8.1     Communication and Education. 35

8.2     Structure Protection. 36

8.3     Emergency Response. 36

8.4     Training. 36

8.5     Vegetation Management 37

8.6     Post Fire Response – Rehabilitation. 37

9.0        Communication and Education. 37

9.1     Communication and Education Goals. 37

9.2     Target Audiences. 38

9.3     Pilot Projects. 38

9.4     Communication Plan. 39

9.5     Website. 39

9.6     Media Contacts, Use and Coordination. 39

9.7     Other Methods. 39

9.7.1        Homeowners. 40

9.7.2        Government Ministries, City and Municipal Officials, Disaster Planning Services, Utilities  40

9.8     General Messages. 40

10.0      Structure Protection. 41

10.1      FireSmart 41

10.1.1      Roofing Material 41

10.1.2      Building Exterior – Siding Material 41

10.1.3      Balconies and Decking. 42

10.1.4      Combustible Materials. 42

10.2      Planning. 42

10.3      Bylaws. 43

10.4      Sprinklers. 44

10.5      Joint City EKRD Cooperation. 44

10.6      Structured FireSmart Assessments of High Risk Areas. 44

11.0      Emergency Response. 44

11.1      Access and Evacuation. 44

11.2      Fire Response. 47

12.0      Training Needs. 47

13.0      Vegetation (Fuel) Management 48

13.1      Principles of Fuel Management 48

13.1.1      Definition. 48

13.1.2      Purpose. 48

13.1.3      Forest Fuels. 49

13.1.4      Surface Fuels. 49

13.1.5      Aerial Fuels. 50

13.2      Fuel Treatment Needs. 52

13.2.1      Mountain Pine Beetle Fuel Management 52

13.2.2      Stand Level Fuel Treatment Needs. 52

13.2.3      The Principles of Landscape Fuelbreak Design. 56

13.2.4      Existing Landscape Fuelbreaks Within the City. 63

13.2.5      Proposed Landscape Fuelbreaks within the City. 64

13.3      Maintenance. 68

14.0      Post Wildfire Rehabilitation Planning. 69

15.0      References. 71

 

List of Figures

 

Figure 1. Map showing the study area covered by this plan, the City boundary and land ownership categories. 14

Figure 2. Fire season summary (April to October) of key indicators that affect fire behaviour. 16

Figure 3. Updated fuel types for the study area. 17

Figure 4. Example of a high-density pole sapling Pinus contorta (lodgepole pine) stand – classified as a C2 fuel type  18

Figure 5. Example of evenly stocked moderate density second growth stand of Pinus contorta (lodgepole pine) – classified as C3 fuel type. 19

Figure 6. Example of a moderate to high-density second growth stand of Thuja plicata (western red cedar) Pseudotsuga menziesii (Douglas fir) and Larix occidentalis (western larch) – classified as C4 fuel type. 20

Figure 7. Moist rich site dominated by aspen – classified as a D1 fuel type. 21

Figure 8. Outline of complex lodgepole pine successional relationships and potential fire severity (From White and Feller et al. 2005) 23

Figure 9. Graphical summary of fire hazard changes associated with an MPB outbreak. 24

Figure 10. Blowdown and breakage contributing to fuel loading. 24

Figure 11. Accumulation of surface fuels (left). Snow damage (right). 25

Figure 12. Fire hazard succession following attack. 26

Figure 13. Projected MPB infestation levels (percentage) for 2005 and 2020 within the study area. 27

Figure14. Stands of lodgepole pine within City limits near the western boundary of the municipality adjacent to wildland urban interface zones. 28

Figure 15. View of topographic relief map of the Elk Valley Highway #3 corridor, looking north towards Fernie (Image Source: Google Earth, 2005). 29

Figure 16. A spatial summary of human and lightning caused fire ignitions within the City (1950 to present). 31

Figure 17. Graphical example showing variation in the definition of interface and intermix. 32

Figure 18. Wildland urban interface and intermix communities in the City. 33

Figure 19. Firebrand caused ignitions where burning embers are carried ahead of the fire front and alight on vulnerable building surfaces. 34

Figure 20. Radiant heat and flame contact allow fire to spread from vegetation to structure or from structure to structure. 34

Figure 21. Wildland urban interface continuum. 35

Figure 22. Example of typical home with wood siding and open decks and balconies. 42

Figure 23. Overview of access routes in the City – Note: yellow highlights indicate neighbourhoods with poor access and evacuation routes. 46

Figure 24. Showing high surface fuel loadings under a forest canopy. 50

Figure 25. Comparisons showing stand level differences in the height to live crown. 51

Figure 26. Comparisons showing stand level differences in crown closure. 51

Figure 27. Comparisons showing stand level differences in density and mortality. 51

Figure 28. Overview of high priority fuel types within the City that pose a spotting and interface fire risk. 53

Figure 29. High vulnerability interface areas. 54

Figure 30. Schematic showing the principles of thinning to reduce stand level hazard. 56

Figure 31. Final overlay of probability and consequence from the Wildfire Risk Management System. 57

Figure 32. Conceptual diagram of a shaded fuelbreak pre treatment and post treatment. 58

Figure 33. 1994 Tyee Fire shaded fuelbreak example. 63

Figure 34. Overview of the highway, transmission rights-of-way, and deciduous fuel types that serve as existing fuel breaks within the City. 64

Figure 35. Overview of proposed and potential fuelbreaks.. 66

 

List of Tables

 

Table 1. Fire history summary within the study area from 1950 - 1999. 30

Table 2. Summary of fire cause within the study area. 30

Table 3. Flame lengths associated with critical levels of fireline intensity that are associated with initiating crown fire, using Byram's (1959) equation. 60

 


1.0                Executive Summary

The City of Fernie, hereinafter referred to as the ‘City’, is a community of approximately 5,000 residents geographically located in the Elk Valley in southeastern British Columbia, near the Alberta border. Fernie is located in Area A of the Regional District of East Kootenay.

Fernie is located on Highway #3 (The Crow’s Nest Pass Highway) in an area renowned for its world class recreation and outstanding mountain environment. Fernie has deep roots in the coal mining industry and was incorporated as a municipality more than 100 years ago. It is a community shaped by tragedy and triumph, being devastated by fire on two occasions and suffering several major mining disasters where many lives were lost. Despite these challenges, the community has persevered and is now poised for another renewal as a mountain resort economy emerges.

 

Traditionally mining, railway and forest sector based, the area is rapidly evolving into a more mature and diversified socio-economic region. While mining and forestry remain very important to the City, other growth sectors include food, beverage, accommodation, entertainment, recreation, retail, personal services, construction, government services and industries that do not need a specific location (such as software development) but want to locate here for lifestyle reasons.

 

The natural resources and people of Fernie and area are its greatest assets. A long history, significant heritage assets, resiliency in the face of adversity, continued employment in traditional resource economies and a bright future make Fernie an authentic Mountain Resort Community[1].

 

This region of the province is susceptible to both lightning and human caused fires. Additionally, an ongoing Mountain Pine Beetle outbreak has the potential to significantly impact the forest fire hazard adjacent to the community over the next twenty years. Overall the community could be classified with a fire risk profile described by a moderate fire probability and high to extreme consequence based on the values at risk.

B.A. Blackwell and Associates Ltd. was retained to develop a Community Wildfire Protection Plan in consultation with City staff Don Stewart – Leisure Services Department, Brian Schmitz – Fire Rescue, and other support staff as required. The City and a supplementary grant from the Union of B.C. Municipalities funded the project.

 

The key priorities for wildfire management planning in the City were identified as:

 

·         Hazard and risk mapping of the City to establish areas of the community that are at greatest risk to fire

·         Facilitation of communication and education to local residents, all levels of government, and the general public

·         Facilitation of a review and amendment of existing and proposed Development permits based on the hazard mapping assessment

·         Facilitation of revisions to building standards and bylaws

·         Identification of potential locations for strategic fuel breaks and forest stand level fuel reduction both within and outside the community

 

A Wildfire Risk Management System (WRMS) was developed to identify key areas of risk within the community and to support the development of the plan. A synopsis of key findings and plan recommendations follows. A total of 23 recommendations were developed for consideration by the City. These focus on Communication and Education, Structure Protection, Emergency Response, Training and Post Fire Rehabilitation.

 

 

2.0                Synopsis of Key Findings

 

2.1                    Risk Assessment

 

The fire risk analysis of probability and consequence indicates that, under high to extreme fire weather conditions, significant areas of the City would be vulnerable to wildfire.

 

While much of the study area has a low to moderate fire probability, the consequence of fire defined by the values at risk is considered high within City limits and immediately adjacent to the municipal boundary. The highest probability fire scenario is a fire start from human ignition within the community that spreads out into the surrounding forest.

 

Under high to extreme fire weather conditions, spotting of burning embers was modeled. The model results indicate that, under high extreme fire weather conditions, a number of forested areas surrounding and within the community would be vulnerable to spotting at wind speeds averaging 9 kilometres per hour or greater. When wind speeds are in excess of 16 kilometres per hour, significant portions of the built up areas of the community would be vulnerable to fire propagation by spotting.

 

Significant portions of the community are immediately adjacent to the forest interface and many of the bordering fuel types are considered high hazard given their spotting and fire behaviour potential.

 

2.2                    Communication and Education

 

The Fernie Fire Service needs to begin actively working on interface fire related communication and education. Public interest and participation in this process is likely to be complicated by the number of absentee owners and part time residents within the community. A significant amount of work is required to engage the community in this issue if successful planning, preparation and risk reduction measures are to be achieved.

 

2.3                    Structure Protection

 

Older businesses and homes in the core of the City are either constructed from materials that have low fire vulnerability or are a safe distance away from forest fuels. The most significant problems related to structure protection are associated with recent and new construction where aesthetic character has influenced the design and construction of homes and businesses without consideration of fire vulnerability and proximity to the forest interface. The building standards and the materials used on these recently constructed structures increase fire risk from an ember shower associated with spotting from a large fire event. In a number of subdivisions, homes and businesses would fail a FireSmart Assessment (the new provincial planning standard for interface communities). Given the extensive nature of the problem and the significant costs involved, this is an issue that cannot easily be rectified in the short term.

 

2.4                    Access Management

 

In general, the City has good access for emergency response and fire suppression. However, there are portions of the City considered isolated because of constrained access in and out. For example, new subdivision construction in the northeast corner of city, above the highway, has one-way access. Emergency access for the purposes of fire protection, in isolated areas within the City of Fernie, is considered a problem that should be addressed through planning and future development.

 

2.5                    Emergency Response

 

Over the past several years Fernie Fire Rescue has undertaken S-100 and S-215 training to deal with interface fires. The current level of training and available equipment related to interface fire response is considered adequate but, given the risk of fire to the community, an advanced program that fosters continuous improvement and skill renewal would be beneficial.

 

The fire risk assessment indicates that the areas most vulnerable to smoke are the lower elevation areas within the main valley. Heavy smoke pooling in the valley bottom will require evacuation of the community and may cripple emergency response given that both the fire hall and local hospital are located in the valley bottom.

 

2.6                    Training

 

All Fernie Fire Rescue staff are currently trained in the S-100 Basic Wildland Fire Fighting course on a yearly basis. The current level of training and available equipment related to interface fire response is considered adequate but, given the risk of fire to the community, an advanced program that fosters continuous improvement and skill renewal would be beneficial.

 

2.7                    Post Fire Rehabilitation

 

An extensive fire within the City or within the watershed could have serious and long lasting consequences that include impacts on visual and water quality, recreation and sensitive resource values, and creation of environmental hazards. Additionally, there could be significant economic losses associated with loss of tourism and overall business revenue. Prompt rehabilitation efforts to restore and green-up burn areas are considered important and should be addressed through a comprehensive post rehabilitation planning exercise.

 


3.0                Recommendations

 

3.1                    Communication and Education

 

Recommendation 1: The City should work with local developers to construct a FireSmart show home that can be used as a tool to educate and communicate the principles of FireSmart to the public. The demonstration home would be built to FireSmart standards using recommended materials for interface communities. Additionally, vegetation adjacent to the home would be managed to guidelines outlined in the FireSmart program.

 

Recommendation 2: The City should add information to their website that outlines community fire risks and proactive steps individual homeowners can apply to making their homes safer within the community. Other information, such as fire danger and FireSmart principles, could be maintained on the City’s website so that fire management issues specific to the City could be easily delivered to the local population.

 

Recommendation 3: Similar to the ski condition reporting available to guests in resorts and businesses, the City should work toward communicating the fire danger during periods of high and extreme danger to businesses and resorts within the City. This information could be posted in hotel lobbies and public venues to facilitate communication of fire danger in the City.

 

Recommendation 4: The Fernie Fire Rescue Department should work with the local Chamber of Commerce to educate the local business community on FireSmart preparation and planning.

 

3.2                    Structure Protection

 

Recommendation 5: At a minimum the planning department should integrate the FireSmart standard into the design of all new subdivision developments within the City.  Wherever possible this standard should be integrated into changes to existing and new construction within subdivisions and built-up areas of the community.

 

Recommendation 6: Many homes and businesses are built immediately adjacent to the forest edge. In these interface neighbourhoods, or where developments occur adjacent to park space, trees and vegetation are often in direct contact with homes. The planning department should create building set backs with a minimum distance of 10m when buildings border the forest interface.

 

Recommendation 7: The City’s Planning Department and Fernie Fire Rescue should begin a process to review and revise existing bylaws and building codes to be consistent with the development of a FireSmart Community.

 

Recommendation 8: In new subdivisions the City should require roofing materials that are fire retardant with a Class A and Class B rating. While it is recognized that wholesale changes to existing roofing materials within the City of Fernie are not practical, a long-term replacement standard that is phased in over the roof rotation period would significantly reduce the vulnerability of the community.

 

Recommendation 9: Given the wildfire risk profile of the community, an emergency sprinkler kit capable of protecting 30 to 50 homes should be purchased and maintained in the community or shared with the regional district. Fernie Fire Rescue personnel, or a designate of the department, should be trained to mobilize and set up the equipment efficiently and effectively during a fire event.

 

 

3.3                    Access Management

 

Recommendation 10: The City must work towards improving access in identified areas of the community that are considered isolated and that have inadequate access for evacuation and fire control.

 

Recommendation 11: An evacuation plan should be developed for the community and the outlying road and trail networks that could be cut off or impacted by fire. A large fire may require the evacuation of heavily used trails where vehicle access is restricted.

 

3.4                    Emergency Response

 

Recommendation 12: During a large wildfire it is probable that the valley bottom (location of the fire hall and hospital) could be severely impacted by smoke. The City should cooperate with provincial and regional governments to develop contingency plans, including an alternate incident command centre and mobile facility, in the event that smoke causes the evacuation of Fernie.

 

3.5                    Training

 

Recommendation 13: The current level of training and available equipment related to interface fire response is considered adequate, but given the risk of fire to the community, Fernie Fire Rescue should adopt an advanced program that fosters continuous improvement and skill renewal.

 

3.6                    Fuel Management

 

Recommendation 14: The modelling of projected beetle attack in the Fernie valley indicates that significant changes in fuels and fire risk are expected in 2020 and beyond. Fuel treatment strategies should target removal of beetle susceptible lodgepole pine. The City should work with the province and TEMBEC to monitor and quantify changes in fire risk associated with the Mountain Pine Beetle outbreak.

 

Recommendation 15: Both the provincial and federal governments have recently announced programs specifically to address the wildfire hazard associated with Mountain Pine Beetle. The City should work with the province to secure funding through these programs to address the problem of a projected outbreak within the City of Fernie and on adjacent crown land.

 

Recommendation 16: A number of high hazard areas immediately adjacent to, or embedded in, the community have been identified as part of the wildfire risk assessment. These high hazard areas should be the focus of a progressive thinning program that is implemented over the next five to ten years. Thinning should be focused on the highest priority areas: C2, C3 and C4 fuel types. The goals of thinning are to remove hazardous fuels and to reduce the overall fire behaviour potential adjacent to the community.

 

Recommendation 17: On lands adjacent to the City limits, ownership complicates the fuel treatment issue. There are areas of crown and private land that have been identified as hazardous. The City should work with the RDEK and the province to secure funding for treatment of crown land adjacent to the City. The City should also work with private land owners (in particular TEMBEC) to address hazardous fuels on private land.

 

Recommendation 18: The City should work with British Columbia Transmission Corporation (BCTC) and BC Hydro to ensure that transmission infrastructure can be maintained and managed during a wildfire event. Maintaining the transmission corridor to a fuel break standard will provide the community with a more reliable power supply that is less likely to fail during a fire event and will reduce the probability of fire spreading into the community.

 

Recommendation 19: The City should prioritize the development of a fuel break network that builds on existing breaks such as the highway, deciduous fuel types, and BC Transmission and BC Hydro corridors running through the City.

 

Recommendation 20: The City should develop further fuel breaks using existing topographic and water features. Given the visual and resource sensitivity of the City, shaded fuel breaks (retaining overstory trees) should be constructed to a size and standard that will minimize fire behaviour potential and aid suppression resources in containing and controlling wildfire.

 

Recommendation 21: Important trail networks should be thinned and understory fuels removed within a 5-metre area on each side of the trail networks. Given the level of pedestrian and bicycle traffic in these areas, thinning will limit the ability of fire to spread and improve fire suppression capability throughout the valley.

 

Recommendation 22: A qualified professional, with a sound understanding of fire behaviour and fire suppression, should develop fuel break plans and prescriptions.

 

Recommendation 23: A significant area of high hazard fuel types identified in this analysis are the responsibility of the crown. Given the spatial scale of this area (approximately 1700 ha) and the current financial resources available it is unlikely that significant progress on treating this area could be achieved under the current funding formulas available. The City of Fernie's financial resources will be taxed just addressing the areas identified within Municipal boundaries. Therefore, it is recommended that the City work with the RDEK and the Province to secure long-term funding of approximately $1,000,000 to begin to address this problem. Conceivably this funding could be spread over a period of 3 to 5 years with the Province and the RDEK taking the lead on the treatment solutions to the hazardous fuel types identified in this analysis on crown land.

 

3.7                    Post Fire Rehabilitation

 

Recommendation 24: The City should develop a plan for post fire rehabilitation that considers the procurement of seed, seedlings and materials required to regenerate an extensive burn area (1,000-5,000 ha). The opportunity to conduct meaningful rehabilitation post fire will be limited to a short fall season (September to November). The focus of initial rehabilitation efforts should be on slope stabilization and infrastructure protection. These issues should form the foundation of an action plan that lays out the necessary steps to stabilize and rehabilitate the burn area.


4.0                Introduction

 

4.1                    Background

 

In 2005 B.A. Blackwell and Associates Ltd. was retained to assist the City of Fernie, hereinafter referred to as “the City”, in developing a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) hereinafter referred to as “the Plan”. ‘FireSmart – Protecting Your Community from Wildfire’ (Partners in Protection 2004) was used to guide the protection planning process. Within the City of Fernie, the assessment considered important elements of community wildfire protection that included communication and education, structure protection, training, emergency response, and vegetation management.

 

The social, economic and environmental losses associated with the 2003 fire season emphasized the need for greater consideration and due diligence in regard to fire risk in the wildland urban interface (WUI). In considering wildfire risk in the WUI, it is important to understand the specific risk profile of a given community, which can be defined by the probability and the associated consequence of fire occurring within that community. While the probability of fire in the Fernie area is somewhat lower than in the southern interior of British Columbia, large interface fires have occurred in this community in the past and the consequences were, and would be, substantial given population size, values at risk, and environmental considerations that include protection of water quality and slope stability.

 

The results of this study will provide the City with a framework that can be used to review and assess areas of identified high fire risk. Additionally, the information contained in this report should help to guide the development of emergency plans, emergency response, communication and education programs, bylaw development in areas of fire risk, and the management of forest lands adjacent to the City of Fernie.

 

4.2                    Purpose and Scope

 

The plan was initiated by the City’s Fire Rescue Department and Leisure Services Department, and was jointly funded by the City and the Union of B.C. Municipalities. The purpose of the plan is to quantify and identify fire risk within the community, develop plans and management actions that can be undertaken to minimize the risk, and provide a tool to communicate and educate the residents and visitors in Fernie about fire risk and management issues.

 

The scope of this project included three distinct phases of work:

 

Phase I –Assessment of fire risk and development of a Wildfire Risk Management System to spatially quantify the probability and consequence of fire.

 

Phase II – Identification of hazardous fuel types and estimation of spotting risk

 

Phase IIIDevelopment of the CWPP, which outlines measures to mitigate the identified risk through structure protection, emergency response, training, communication and education.

 

 

 

5.0                The City of Fernie

 

5.1                    Study Area

 

Figure 1 outlines the area that is encompassed by this plan and the municipal boundary of the City. The total study area that makes up this plan includes map sheet numbers 082G.054, 082G.055, 082G.056, 082G.044, 082G.045 and 082.046. The gross area of the City is 16,050 ha and the total study area is 57,640 ha. All area within the City boundary is designated as private ownership according to provincial resource inventory data. Of the total study area, federally owned land accounts for 968 ha (0.02%), provincially owned land for 27,067 ha (46.96%), and privately owned land for 29,603 ha (51.34%). The remaining 1.68% is out of ownership (e.g. waterways). The ownership information is based on 1997 inventory data and may have changed in the past eight years.

 

Figure 1. Map showing the study area covered by this plan, the City boundary and land ownership categories.

 

5.2                    Population

 

The City is a premier destination in winter and summer with a population of 4,611[2] permanent residents as determined by the 2001 Canada Census. However, more recent, unofficial estimates put the permanent population at approximately 5,200[3].  Seasonal visitors are likely to substantially increase the population, particularly in the winter.

5.3                    Infrastructure

 

A small hospital and Fernie Fire Rescue are critical to emergency response service in the community. Both are considered essential in a community where outdoor activities contribute to injuries and accidents on a daily basis. These facilities also provide the foundation for an incident command center during a large fire event and therefore must be prepared to deal with large and complex emergency situations.

 

Emergency response is dependent on electrical and water service within the community in the event of a large-scale emergency. The community is dependent on surface water from a single watershed. This watershed provides water to the City through a gravity fed system. Any disturbance (human and/or natural) within this watershed has the potential to impact the supply of drinking water to the community.

 

Fernie’s electrical service comes from the transmission network, running west to east, that bisects the community. A large fire has the potential to impact this service through disruption in network distribution. Fallen trees associated with a fire event may cause power outages. Consideration must be given to protecting this critical function and providing power back up at key facilities to ensure that the emergency response functions are reliable.

 

The key infrastructure discussed above was considered as part of the Wildfire Risk Management System. The results of this analysis indicate that consideration must be given to protection of the critical infrastructure identified above.

 

5.4                    Economy

 

The economy of Fernie is primarily based on resource extraction industries, with 50% of the population working in areas directly or indirectly related to these industries. However, due to industrial tax sharing agreements, the community’s economy is actually more dependent on these industries than is apparent through employment. Recreation-based tourism, community services, retail services and construction trades form the remainder of the business base[4]. Recreation-based tourism is perceived as the major driver of growth in the City.

 

External trends such as changing demographics, climate change, globalization, emerging resorts, and growing competition could all have a significant impact on the economy of the City. A large fire within and/or adjacent to the community could have short and long term implications for the stability of the Fernie economy.

 

6.0                Fire Environment

 

6.1                    Fire Weather

 

The Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System (CFFDRS), developed by the Canadian Forestry Service, is used to assess fire danger and related potential fire behaviour. The Ministry of Forests maintains a network of fire weather stations during the fire season that is used to determine Fire Danger on forestlands within and adjacent to the City. It is important to understand the likelihood of exposure to periods of high fire danger, as defined by Danger Class IV (high) and V (extreme), in order to determine appropriate prevention programs, levels of response, and management strategies.

 

Fire danger within the City can vary significantly from season to season. The City is defined by the regional climate of the Interior Cedar Hemlock (ICH) zone, and the Engelmann Spruce – Subalpine fir (ESSF) zone. Figure 2 is a compilation of available weather station data within the Interior Cedar Hemlock moist cool biogeoclimatic unit (representative of the City) that dates back to 1970. The data provides a summary of the percentage of days per month during the fire season that have: drought code values greater than 350; drought code values greater than 500; fire weather index values greater than 20, and a danger rating of greater than Fire Danger Class III. The graph shows the percentage of days per month that these indicators are at, or above, values associated with high to extreme fire behaviour.

 

 

Figure 2. Fire season summary (April to October) of key indicators that affect fire behaviour.


6.2                    Fuels

 

Fuel classification was based on the Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System (CFFDRS) and a summary of fuel type attributes collected in the field. For each type identified, we have attempted to best approximate the CFFDRS classification and have substantiated this classification with a summary of detailed attributes. This typing (Figure 3) is not meant to definitively represent fuel type variation within the City but does provide a better reference point from which to make recommendations.

 

 

Figure 3. Updated fuel types for the study area.


 

The following is a general description of the dominant fuel types within the City.

 

C2 fuel type

 

Fuels within this type are classified as CFFDRS fuel type C2. The total area classified as C2 within the study area was 7,395 ha. Stands are structurally classified as pole sapling to young forest, and at lower elevations are dominated by one of the following: Thuja plicata (western red cedar), Pseudotsuga menziesii (Douglas-fir), Pinus contorta (lodgepole pine), Larix occidentalis (western larch) and Picea spp (Spruce). Stand density in this fuel type is as high as 15,520 stems/ha (average is 3833 stems/ha). Average tree height is 12.3 m with average crown closure from forest cover at 31%. The average height of live crown is typically less than 2 meters. Surface fuel loading is less than 5 kg/m2 and the duff depth ranges from 5 to 10 cm. Burning difficulty is considered moderate but the crown fire hazard is considered extreme. Figure 4 shows an example of C2 fuels.

 

·            Stand density: 3833 stems/ha

·            Woody surface fuels: <5 kg/ m2

·            Height to live crown: <2 m

·            Average stand age: 102 years

·            Average crown closure: 31%

·            Vegetation: understory vegetation is sparse to none given extremely low light levels (< 5% cover)

·            Burn difficulty: moderate; if fire is wind driven then there is a high potential for extreme fire behaviour and active crown fire within this fuel type.

 

Figure 4. Example of a high-density pole sapling Pinus contorta (lodgepole pine) stand classified as a C2 fuel type

 


C3 fuel type

 

Fuels within this type are classified as CFFDRS fuel type C3. The total area classified as C3 within the plan area was 2,590 ha. Stands are typically classified as young forest and at lower elevations are dominated by one of the following Pseudotsuga menziesii (Douglas-fir), Thuja plicata (western red cedar), Pinus contorta (lodgepole pine) or Larix occidentalis (western larch). Average stand age is approximately 94 years old. Stand density in this fuel type averages 4665 stems/ha. Average tree height is 23 m with crown closure averaging 51%. The crown base height is typically greater than 6m. Surface fuel loading is less than 5 kg/m2 and the duff depth ranges from 5 to 7 cm. Burn difficulty is considered low to moderate but the crown fire hazard is considered moderate. Figure 5 shows an example of C3 fuels.

 

·          Stand density: 4665 stems/ha

·          Woody surface fuels: <5kg/ m2

·          Crown base height: >6 m

·          Average stand age: 94 years

·          Average crown closure: average 51%

·          Vegetation: understory vegetation is typically low given low light levels (< 30% cover)

·          Burn difficulty: low to moderate; if fire is wind driven then there is a high potential for extreme fire behaviour and active crown fire.

 

 

Figure 5. Example of evenly stocked moderate density second growth stand of Pinus contorta (lodgepole pine) classified as C3 fuel type.


C4 fuel type

 

Fuels within this type are classified as CFFDRS fuel type C4. The total area classified as C4 within the plan area was 3,570 ha. Typically, stands in this fuel type are structurally classified as young forest[AJN1]  and at lower elevations are dominated by one of the following Pseudotsuga menziesii (Douglas-fir), Thuja plicata (western red cedar), Pinus contorta (lodgepole pine) or Larix occidentalis (western larch). Average stand age is approximately 75 years old. Average stand density in this fuel type is 3100 stems/ha. Average tree height is 14.8 m with crown closure averaging 51%. The crown base height ranges between 2 and 6 m. Surface fuel loading is less than 5 kg/m2 and the duff depth ranges from 5 to 10 cm. Burning difficulty is considered moderate but the crown fire hazard is considered high. Figure 6 shows an example of C4 fuels.

 

·          Stand density: 3100 stems/ha

·          Woody surface fuels: <5kg/ m2

·          Crown base height: 2-6m

·          Average stand age: 75 years

·          Average crown closure: average 51%

·          Vegetation: understory vegetation is typically low given low light levels (< 25% cover)

·          Burn difficulty: moderate; if fire is wind driven then there is a high potential for extreme fire behaviour and active crown fire.

 

 

Figure 6. Example of a moderate to high-density second growth stand of Thuja plicata (western red cedar) Pseudotsuga menziesii (Douglas fir) and Larix occidentalis (western larch) classified as C4 fuel type.

D1 fuel type

 

Fuels within this type are classified as CFFDRS fuel type D1. The total area classified as D1 within the plan area was 4,732 ha. Stands are structurally classified as young forest[AJN2]  and at lower elevations are dominated by Populus tremuloides (trembling aspen), Populus balsamifera (balsam poplar), with minor components of Pseudotsuga menziesii (Douglas-fir), Thuja plicata (western red cedar), Pinus contorta (lodgepole pine) or Larix occidentalis (western larch). Average stand age is approximately 83 years old. Stand density in this fuel type averages 4213 stems/ha. Average tree height is 14 m with crown closure averaging 22%. The crown base height averaged greater than 6 m. Surface fuel loading is less than 5 kg/m2 and the duff depth ranges from 3 to 7 cm. Burning difficulty is considered low and the crown fire hazard is considered low. Figure 7 shows an example of D1 fuels.

 

·          Stand density: 4213 stems/ha

·          Woody surface fuels: <5kg/ m2

·          Crown base height: > 6m

·          Average stand age: 83 years

·          Average crown closure: 22%

·          Vegetation: understory vegetation is typically shrub and herb dominated (> 90% cover)

·          Burn difficulty: low; low overall fire behaviour potential and low crown fire potential.

 

Figure 7. Moist rich site dominated by aspen – classified as a D1 fuel type.

 

M2 fuel type

 

Fuels within this type are classified as CFFDRS fuel type M2. The total area classified as M2 within the plan area was 10,253 ha. Stands are structurally classified as pole sapling to young forest and at lower elevations are dominated by Populus tremuloides (trembling aspen), Populus balsamifera (balsam poplar), Pseudotsuga menziesii (Douglas-fir), Pinus contorta (lodgepole pine), Abies lasiocarpa. (subalpine fir) or Picea spp (Spruce). Average stand age is approximately 102 years old. Stand density in this fuel type averages 4302 stems/ha. Average tree height is 20 m with crown closure averaging 42%. The crown base height is typically greater than 6 m. Surface fuel loading is less than 5 kg/m2 and the duff depth ranges from 5 to 10 cm. Burn difficulty is considered low and the crown fire hazard is considered low.

 

·          Stand density: 4302 stems/ha

·          Woody surface fuels: <5kg/ m2

·          Crown base height: > 6m

·          Average stand age: 102 years

·          Average crown closure: 42%

·          Vegetation: understory vegetation is typically shrub and herb dominated (> 70% cover)

·          Burn difficulty: low to moderate; if fire is wind driven then there is a high potential for passive to active crown fire.

 

6.3                    Mountain Pine Beetle and the Impact on Forest Fuels

 

Similar to many communities in B.C., Fernie is experiencing an outbreak of Mountain Pine Beetle. Lodgepole pine is particularly susceptible to attack by Mountain Pine Beetle, and is one of the major wood species harvested in the region.

 

From a fire perspective, the current outbreak is a concern because it contributes surface fuels that will accelerate fire spread and fire intensity, allowing fires to move more easily into the tree crowns. The intimate relationship and critical role that bark beetles and fire play in the natural succession of lodgepole pine forests has been well documented. These forests, which occupy millions of hectares in the Pacific Northwest, are generally even aged stands younger than 100 years old. This even-aged forest structure is a result of periodic wildfires which follow high mortality from bark beetle attacks (Fellin 1979; Mitchell and Martin 1980; Koch 1996; Price 1991; Schowalter et al. 1981). The stands have adapted to these natural rotations, which tend to repeat every 100 years. Examples illustrating this cycle include the 1988 wildfires in Yellowstone National Park, the 1961 wildfire in the Bitterroot National Forest in Montana, and fires in Washington and Idaho in 1994.

 

Mountain pine beetle outbreaks occur mainly in mature forests, which are 80 to 150 years old. The outbreaks subside when most of the large diameter trees are killed. The dead trees then fuel subsequent fires, which regenerate the stand (Amman 1990; Fellin 1979; Geiszler et al. 1980; Price 1991). It has been hypothesized that these two agents of disturbance interact to maintain the structure and function of pine forests. Fire regulates forest regeneration in space and time, which is necessary for the pine beetle, and the pine beetle regulates the turnover of patches of dead trees conducive to burning (Schowalter et al. 1981).

 

Figure 8. Outline of complex lodgepole pine successional relationships and potential fire severity (From White and Feller et al. 2005)

 

In the past, agents of disturbance were viewed as a threat to the health of the valuable forest resource. Therefore, standard policy has been to suppress all wildfire and eliminate forest pests. In pine forests, this has resulted in unstable forests that are increasingly susceptible to physical and biological stresses.

 

Healthy stands typically have a low fire hazard with crown closure ranging from 35 to 45%. This may vary in stands where pine is not the dominant species. Beetle mortality results in a short-term immediate increase in stand level fire hazard during the red attack stage. Fire behaviour observations suggest that rates of spread and head fire intensity are greater when fires burn through red-attacked stands.

 

The red attack stage of the beetle infestation is followed by foliar inputs to the forest floor, and the creation of standing dead snags (attacked stand). Depending on the site conditions, the loss of overstory tree foliage increases light levels to the forest floor surface and can result in a flush of understory vegetation including new seedlings that regenerate naturally (understory release). This flush depends on a number of factors but is primarily a function of available light, nutrients, moisture and the existing seed bank and plant community. Over time, the seedlings begin to dominate the understory forming a contiguous sapling layer (seedling dominance). At this same time, the dead trees originally killed by beetle attack have become decaying snags, and begin to fall creating high inputs of surface fuel (pine dominated understory). At this point, the stand has reached its highest fire hazard with the combination of a contiguous fuel load from the surface of the forest floor into the overstory canopy. These characteristics yield a stand that is now highly susceptible to stand replacing crown fire.

 

 

Figure 9. Graphical summary of fire hazard changes associated with an MPB outbreak.

 

Figure 10, Figure 11 and Figure 12 illustrate the initial stages of fuel loading and an increasing fire hazard.

 

 

Figure 10. Blowdown and breakage contributing to fuel loading.

 

Figure 11. Accumulation of surface fuels (left). Snow damage (right).

 

Modelling projections of the Mountain Pine Beetle outbreak (Eng 2004) suggest that, over the next 15 years, the forests adjacent to the City will experience significant mortality of lodgepole pine in the absence of any intervention (falling and burning or control through harvest) (Figure 13). Based on the discussion above it is expected that surface fuel loads will increase over the next 20 years and landscape level fire hazard in pine dominated forests around the community will peak between 30 and 40 years. Any harvest within close proximity of the City, or tree removal within city limits, should target mature lodgepole pine to reduce the overall landscape level susceptibility. Any prescribed fuel treatments and/or creation of firebreaks should focus on the removal of lodgepole pine. Taking this approach will help to reduce the overall landscape level hazard and potentially limit the size and distribution of the forecasted outbreak.

Recent beetle attack has been limited to the outskirts of the City (to the south and north). The current Mountain Pine Beetle outbreak within the study area is not significantly contributing to fuel loadings and associated fire risk. However, properties along the eastern boundary of the city will be the most heavily impacted by the outbreak based on the projections. The stands surrounding these areas have a low to moderate component of susceptible pine. Left unmanaged, these stands have a high probability of supporting moderate to high fuel loads and will follow the fire hazard succession outlined in Figure 12. Figure14 shows an example of the interface zones dominated by pine.

 

Figure 12